Tennis News

The Court of Arbitration for Sport has issued its decision on Maria Sharapova’s appeal of her two-year suspension for an anti-doping violation incurred in January, reducing her suspension to 15 months. Sharapova will be allowed to return to the tour on April 26th, 2017.

Here’s what you need to know about the CAS decision, which can be read in full here.

How did Sharapova’s case get to CAS?

In June, a three-member independent tribunal appointed by the ITF handed Sharapova a two-year suspension, back-dated to the date of Sharapova’s first failed doping test in January at the Australian Open. The tribunal found that Sharapova’s violation, wherein she tested positive for Meldonium, a substance that was banned on January 1st of this year, was unintentional but that she bore “significant fault” for failing to “put in place an adequate system to check for changes made each year to the Prohibited List.”

In particular, the tribunal found Sharapova’s decision to delegate to her agent the task of checking her medication against WADA’s prohibited list unreasonable.

Said the tribunal:
“The contravention of the anti-doping rule was not intentional as Ms Sharapova did not appreciate that Mildronate contained a substance prohibited from 1 January 20I6.

“However she does bear sole responsibility for the contravention, and very significant fault, in failing to take any steps to check whether the continued use of this medicine was permissible. If she had not concealed her use of Mildronate from the anti-doping authorities, members of her own support team and the doctors whom she consulted, but had sought advice, then the contravention would have been avoided. She is the sole author of her misfortune.”

Under the tribunal’s ruling, Sharapova was eligible to return on January 25th, 2018. Sharapova appealed the decision to CAS in June and the case was heard in September in New York.

What did CAS have to decide?

Sharapova requested that her suspension be reduced on the grounds that she bore “no significant fault” for her anti-doping violation. The ITF responded and requested the tribunal’s decision be upheld.

Based on the governing code and prior precedent, the question before CAS was two-fold:

1. What was Sharapova’s level of fault and, more specifically, did she bear “no significant fault” for her anti-doping violation?
2. If Sharapova bore no significant fault, meaning CAS could reduce her suspension at their discretion, what should that sanction be?

What does “no significant fault” mean?

According to the relevant code, “no significant fault” requires a player establish “that his/her Fault or negligence, when viewed in the totality of the circumstances and taking into account the criteria for No Fault or Negligence, was not significant in relationship to the AntiDoping Rule Violation.”

4. Strong statement from CAS towards the end of the decision. pic.twitter.com/uxo8lXmsgk

— WTA Insider (@WTA_insider) October 4, 2016

What did CAS find?

A three-person independent panel disagreed with the tribunal’s decision that Sharapova bore significant fault for her anti-doping violation. In coming to that conclusion, CAS ruled that Sharapova’s delegation of duties to her agent and agency was reasonable and that his dereliction of that duty should not be imputed on her for the purposes of determining fault. The ITF argued that it was unreasonable to delegate the duty to someone who was untrained and unqualified to monitor her anti-doping responsibilities. CAS disagreed, finding her agent and agency qualified for the task.

As CAS explained:

“Checking a substance against the Prohibited List is not an action for which specific anti-doping training is required. It is expected to be made, as a rule and under Article 3.1.2 of the TADP, by the player personally, and a player does not need to have scientific or medical expertise for such purpose. No standard in the WADC or otherwise raises such a high bar.

“Therefore, the delegation to Mr. Eisenbud, an expert sports agent, aware of the importance of the services rendered to the Player, and whose livelihood was dependent on the athletic success of the Player, was not precluded by any lack of scientific or medical qualification, openly recognized by Mr. Eisenbud himself. In other words, the Player chose a sufficiently qualified person as her delegate for the purposes of checking the Prohibited List.”

Monday fun day on court ? ? pic.twitter.com/MzJHyL8xmK

— Maria Sharapova (@MariaSharapova) September 27, 2016

Having found Sharapova bore “no significant fault”, CAS then turned to the question of whether her suspension should be reduced. Though she bore “no significant fault”, CAS found she bore some degree of fault for failing to give adequate instruction or supervision over the process.

“The Player did not tell Mr. Eisenbud to check (and Mr. Eisenbud therefore did not check) whether Mildronate was only a “brand name” or indicated the ingredient of the product; she did not put him in touch with Dr. Skalny at the time she left the care of Dr. Skalny, but simply supplied Mr. Eisenbud with the names of the Skalny Products; she did not instruct Mr Eisenbud to consult the WADA, ITF or WTA website, to call the ITF “hot line”, to open the flash drive supplied with the “wallet card”, or even to read the emails received, opening the “links” therein contained. She simply passed the entire matter over to Mr Eisenbud, completely relying on him.

“In the same way, the Player did not establish any procedure to supervise and control the actions performed by Mr. Eisenbud in the discharge of the tasks he was expected to perform: no procedure for reporting or follow-up verification was established to make sure that Mr Eisenbud had actually discharged the duty, for instance, of checking year after year the Skalny Products towards the Prohibited List.

“Such circumstances show some degree of fault on the part of the Player, but they do not exclude altogether the possibility for the Player to invoke [“no significant fault”].

As a result, CAS looked at the totality of the circumstances and reduced Sharapova’s ban by nine months.

Sundayzzz ? pic.twitter.com/FwX9ZM6XtX

— Maria Sharapova (@MariaSharapova) October 2, 2016

When can Sharapova return to tour?

The earliest date Sharapova can return to tour is April 26th, 2017. She may play at any event that starts after April 25th. That date coincides with the European clay court season, though notably the Porsche Tennis Grand Prix in Stuttgart, Germany begins on April 24th. She would ineligible for that event.

How will Sharapova compete on tour without a ranking?

Sharapova is currently ranked No.95 with 690 ranking points, all from the 2015 WTA Finals where she advanced to the semifinals. When she returns to the tour next year she will have zero points on her ranking, meaning she cannot gain direct entry into tour-level events.

However, as a former Grand Slam champion (and WTA Finals champion), by rule, she is allowed an unlimited number of wildcard nominations at WTA tour events. She can also build up her ranking on the ITF Circuit.

Are there any more appeals?

Barring a procedural error, CAS’s decision in the case is final.

Finishing the weekend strong!! ???? pic.twitter.com/qnThLJ9XMs

— Maria Sharapova (@MariaSharapova) October 3, 2016

All photos courtesy of Getty Images.

BEIJING, China – Unseeded and looming at the China Open, BNP Paribas Open finalists and Wimbledon semifinalists Karolina Pliskova and Julia Goerges recovered from a second set hiccup to score their first win over No.7 seeds Martina Hingis and CoCo Vandeweghe, 6-3, 4-6, 10-8. The win assured Pliskova of her qualification at the BNP Paribas WTA Finals Singapore presented by SC Global in both singles and doubles.

Watch live action from Beijing on WTA Live powered by TennisTV!

“I’d beaten Hingis just once, and we lost to them in Cincinnati. We’re really happy with the win; the super tie-break was tough,” Pliskova said after the match.

“It’s amazing; I’m already there for singles, so it’ll be great to be there in doubles as well.”

Pliskova and Goerges enjoyed a strong start before the former doubles No.1 rebounded with her new partner and fellow US Open semifinalist.

“I think overall, it was a good match with some good parts from both of us,” Goerges explained. “There were some sloppy games where they really gained confidence. We lost some tight points, but luckily won the first set on a deciding point; it was really a key to staying in the match because we’d really lost momentum.

“The second set, we were down 3-0 right away; we somehow came back but couldn’t manage to break CoCo’s serve again because she was serving pretty big. The match tie-break was up and down; we were 2-5 down, then 8-5 up.

“We served pretty big with two aces, which help in a match tie-break. We’re pretty happy to get through.”

For Goerges, it will also be her first appearance at the WTA Finals, a welcome surprise for a team comprised of two singles specialists.

“It’s very exciting; I must say! We didn’t plan it, because it was our first year playing together. We said we’d only play around 10 tournaments, and to qualify with eight pretty decent results is pretty special for us.

“Kaja will be going there for singles as well, but for me, it’s amazing to go to Singapore. It’s always been a dream, either in singles or doubles – hopefully one day I’ll get to go for singles too – but it’s exciting and a nice way to end the season.”

Goerges and Pliskova rounds out a stacked field full of talented teams; click here to learn more about the elite eight!

ZHUHAI, China – With the year’s final Premier-Mandatory event at the China Open done and dusted, there were a few key changes to the Huajin Securities WTA Elite Trophy Zhuhai leaderboard.

By virtue of reaching the final in Beijing, Johanna Konta has moved out of the Zhuhai race and Dominika Cibulkova, a finalist at the Dongfeng Motor Wuhan Open, has stepped in.

Carla Suárez Navarro and Svetlana Kuznetsova have kept their spots near the top of the field, along with Wuhan winner Petra Kvitova and defending Zhuhai champion Venus Williams.

But while the top of the Huajin Securities WTA Elite Trophy Zhuhai leaderboard looks solid, the bottom spots could still be up for grabs after a busy three-tournament week.

Barbora Strycova, No.19 on the leaderboard, is 110 points clear of former No.1 Caroline Wozniacki, who has experienced a late-season renaissance. The Dane has carried her form into the Asian swing, and a run to the semifinals or better at the Prudential Hong Kong Tennis Open could put her firmly in contention for Zhuhai.

The year’s final tournament will take place in Zhuhai, China and will run from November 1 to 6. Like last year, the singles draw will feature 11 of the top ranked players and one wildcard, with the winner collecting 700 ranking points.

The Huajin Securities WTA Elite Trophy announced last week that Asian No.1 Zhang Shuai received the wildcard to round out the 12-player field in Zhuhai.

Here’s the latest leaderboard update for the Huajin Securities WTA Elite Trophy Zhuhai as of October 10, 2016:

SINGAPORE – The BNP Paribas WTA Finals Singapore presented by SC Global is under a fortnight away and once again fans have the chance to get closer to that action thanks to the Official WTA Finals Mobile App, Created by SAP.

The app provides access to exclusive tournament content, including:

* Virtual Replay – the ability for fans to view, track and replay ball movement
* Leaderboard Stats – a player comparison tool tracking aces, fastest serves and a whole host of other information
* Player Notifications – keep up to date with all the news about your favorite players
* Fan Zone – a social media hub where fans can participate in live polls and engage on Twitter and Facebook

The finalists for the 2016 WTA Player Of The Year awards were announced just hours ago, but Serena Williams has already cast her vote.

Eagle-eyed Instagram users spotted the former World No.1 leaving a comment on the WTA’s Instagram page that left little doubt as to which player she thought had the best season, and it’s no surprise who she voted for.

Serena has cast her vote for @WTA Player of the Year. pic.twitter.com/9WcckWn8WK

— WTA Insider (@WTA_insider) October 14, 2016

Did you catch it? Here’s who Serena voted for in the 2016 WTA Player Of The Year award:

The comment comes as no surprise, as the pair’s fierce rivalry this year has played out across two Grand Slam finals, with Kerber winning her maiden major title at the Australian Open and Serena later getting her revenge at Wimbledon in her record-tying 22nd Grand Slam title.

Kerber finally unseated Serena as the WTA World No.1 in September after the German won the US Open, but Serena had foreseen her rise much earlier than that.

After her loss in the final in Melbourne back in January, an introspective Serena was asked about Kerber’s rise to World No.2, and she had this to say:

QUESTION: Pretty deserved No. 2 in the world now?

SERENA WILLIAMS: I think so. I mean, she’s had a great month. She got to the finals in Brisbane. She won here. So, yeah. I was surprised and really happy for her. I’m like, Whoa, No. 2.

What’s after 2 is 1, so I guess I better be careful (laughter).