Catching Up With Nadia Petrova

Catching Up With Nadia Petrova

  • Posted: Jan 01, 1970

The St. Petersburg Ladies Trophy debuts on the WTA calendar following an Australian Open that featured impressive performances from a trio of talented young Russians. Among them, Margarita Gasparyan reached her first major second week, while former French Open junior champion Daria Kasatkina made a second straight Grand Slam third round. Each fell to World No.1 Serena Williams; each will be on hand to play her home tournament.

On the outside looking in is another Russian Roland Garros junior champ – off the court for the last two years with a torn labral, but one who knows a thing or two about playing the 21-time Grand Slam champion on Rod Laver Arena.

Former World No.3 Nadia Petrova played a pair of must-watch Melbourne matches against the American in the mid-00s – the last coming in 2007, when Williams was ranked No.81.

“I remember that match,” Petrova told WTA Insider last fall. “I was two points away from winning, serving for it. But in this critical situation, she came up with some amazing shots and I was pushed back to the wall. I tried everything and she would come up with something even better.”

The Muscovite later got her revenge in Beijing and Madrid, becoming one of the few players to earn back-to-back wins over the World No.1.

Nadia Petrova

“I always enjoyed our matches; every time I stepped on the court against her, I was never intimidated. I knew what I had to do in order to win, or at least play a good match.”

A prominent part of Russia’s golden generation – one that includes Grand Slam champions Maria Sharapova, Svetlana Kuznetsova, and Anastasia Myskina, Olympic Gold medalist Elena Dementieva, and World No.1 Dinara Safina – Petrova has been trying to heal an injury she first picked up during the 2013 French Open – ten years after she became the first Russian woman since Olga Morozova in 1975 to reach the semifinals on the terre battue.

“It was very cold that year,” she said of her first round loss to Monica Puig. “I thought my muscles were just overworked. The doctors and physios said that I needed a good break and I would be fine for the grass court season.

“I followed that advice, but when I returned to court, it got worse, to the point that I struggled through my first round at Wimbledon. It was a little bit easier in doubles, but I had to do more medical research and see some other specialists.”

Despite managing to qualify for a sixth overall WTA Finals appearance with Katarina Srebotnik, the 37-time WTA titlist (13 singles, 24 doubles) soon made the decision to stop playing altogether in the hopes of fully healing her hip before launching a return.

“I’d rather be playing tournaments, going from one place to another. I miss all the emotions, the excitement of a win or a loss. That part of me is missing right now, but unfortunately my hip has been still giving me a hard time.”

Nadia Petrova

No stranger to long lay-offs, a then-19-year-old Petrova was poised for a breakout 2002 season when a stress fracture stunted her progress for six months.

“That was a reality check, and a big test for me,” she said of her first major injury. “I’d had a great off-season, and I started really well in my first event, almost beating Venus Williams. I was a Top 30 player for the first time, but right before the Australian Open, I had to pull out because of my foot.

“It was hard seeing the Australian Open, French Open, Wimbledon just go by. All that was left was to just see it on TV. My ranking dropped out of Top 100, and it was the first time that I had to start from the scratch. But I managed, and I’m sure that made me a stronger and better player.”

Rehabbing a labral tear presently remains the biggest test for the now-33-year-old Russian, who refuses to make any immediate decisions about her future.

“I’ll feel like I’m making improvements, but as soon as I start loading my body with practicing and playing, it starts showing signs of breaking down again. I think it’s from the years that I’ve been on tour, the wear and tear.”

Nadia Petrova

For a woman on the move for most of her life, 24 months at a standstill has been a “mixture of emotions” for the two-time Grand Slam semifinalist, who has spent the time finishing the renovations on her Miami home, giving back through her eponymous foundation, and otherwise enjoying a normal life with her dog.

“It does feel good to be in one place. It’s nice to wake up in your own bed every morning, but after doing it for so many years, you get used to the traveling. Sometimes I do miss getting on a plane and going somewhere, the change of surroundings. I’m getting a bit tired of being in one place.”

The daughter of elite athletes – her mother was an Olympic bronze medalist in the 4×400 meter relay – Petrova began playing tennis at eight years old; she left Moscow at 12 as her parents pursued coaching opportunities in Egypt and Poland.

As a teenager, she relocated to the Netherlands to work with coach Glen Schaap (who later worked with Safina and junior rival Jelena Dokic), but admitted it was hard to ever feel at home in any one place.

“I really didn’t get attached to people. Of course, you make friends, but it’s not like ones you grow up and go to school with, and you create a strong bond. It’s hard to leave those kinds of people behind, but I didn’t really have that.

“I do have a lot of friends in all these places that I still keep in touch with, and I did enjoy traveling. I was a teenager that really liked exploring new places, getting to know new cultures, cuisines. For me, it was fascinating.”

Nadia Petrova

Some of her strongest bonds were forged during her brief tenure on the junior circuit, where she upset Dokic for the 1998 junior title in Paris.

“We were competing against each other but we still were into socializing and hanging out. We would always do something fun after the tennis was over. It was a lot of good quality time.

“Transitioning from juniors to pros, we kept close, tried to support each other, show up at each other’s matches. But it was an emotional rollercoaster because there’s a big gap in level. Everyone is older, more experienced, and a lot stronger.

“It was a difficult moment and, of course, when you are a brand new player on the tour, it’s not like everyone is warm and welcoming. You have to earn your spot among the players, and prove yourself with good wins.”

Former No.1 Tracy Austin once remarked, “Every time Petrova gets up a head of steam, she gets injured.” Indeed, physical issues of varying severity likely kept the Russian, with her big serve and booming all-court game, from realizing her potential in an era that boasted both Williams sisters, Belgians Justine Henin and Kim Clijsters, Americans Lindsay Davenport and Jennifer Capriati, Swiss Miss Martina Hingis, French star Amélie Mauresmo – and, of course, all of her countrywomen.

Nadia Petrova

“It’s just genetically how my body is built and how it handles all the sudden movements in a match. A lot of leg injuries and muscle strains I had came from my lower back and my pelvis being out of alignment. It took me a while to understand that, to start taking proper care of my body.

“I’m also not that kind of a player where, if I’m out for two-three months, I can pick up where I left off. It would take me a while to get back into everything – the tournaments and months of practice – to that same level where I could feel and see the game, to feel confident on the court again.”

When it came together, she was almost unstoppable. She won her own Olympic Bronze medal in women’s doubles with Maria Kirilenko and titles on all surfaces in her 15 years on tour. She defeated 16 of her generation’s 18 Grand Slam champions, and 13 of the 14 women who had been or went on to be World No.1.

She is one of only ten women to beat both Williams sisters – winners of a combined 45 Grand Slam titles – in singles and doubles, and handed former No.1 Kim Clijsters the most lop-sided loss of her career, a 6-0, 6-1 clinic at the 2010 Australian Open that Petrova calls her “perfect match.”

Her first breakthrough came in 2003; ranked No.76, she roared into the final four of the French Open, repeating the run two years later.

Nadia Petrova

“After the foot injury in 2002, I had no expectations. I knew my draw was difficult, but I had an amazing first round over Monica Seles and followed it up with the win over Capriati.

“I remember even having set point against Clijsters in the semifinals but I was having a bit of pain in my leg. After losing that set point, I was really not able to regain that level.

“But that really was a big turning point for me in my career.”

A player for whom potential often outpaced progress, Petrova was the best player not to have won a WTA title for two years, falling in her first four finals before coming full circle at the Generali Ladies Linz.

“A few times, I felt like I had bad luck because I was so close. Other times, I’d get into my head when I was close to winning, and I couldn’t finish it off because of the nerves. I was over-thinking it too much.

“I have such good memories of Linz because it was a lot of firsts for me. It was my first doubles title, and my first singles title, as well. It was almost like a home tournament, and everything was organized very well. I liked the city, and the extra things that they would do for the players. They went out of the way to make it a nice tournament. After the first win there, everything got a lot easier.”

Nadia Petrova

For a while, it was effortless. She paired up with longtime friend Tomasz Iwanski in early 2006 and won her next four finals, heading into the French Open as the best player without a major title, at a career-high ranking with a 15-match winning streak on clay.

“I was feeling very confident; it was the first time I saw winning a Grand Slam as a possibility. I started to believe, but unfortunately, it was very sad, some silly injury. I felt my dreams were shattered, or at least that kind of belief and confidence.”

Straining her upper leg in practice, she fought through a losing first round battle against Akiko Morigami, a missed opportunity from which Petrova believes she never recovered.

“I did regain a certain level of play, but I don’t think I ever came close to that mental state in my career where I felt like I was able to make that extra step.

“For me, it was about the results, winning a lot of matches and just keeping the momentum.”

Nadia Petrova

Petrova separated from Iwanski soon after, leading to a string of coaching arrangements – including one with Vlado Platenik, who currently coaches Kastkina – that yielded an array of highs and lows.

“Honestly, I wish I had one coach from the beginning to the end of my career, having established a strong relationship. I know I’m not also an easy person on the court; I’m a perfectionist, and I have my demands.

“But I also feel like many coaches stop giving 100% after a while. I’m a person who wants 100% from a coach every day, at every tournament.

“It’s the same amount I’m asking from myself when I’m on the court.”

Taking that 100% and putting it toward a more philanthropic bend has been the most rewarding part of her time away from tour. The Nadia Petrova Foundation works with underprivileged children by raising funds and organizing clinics that teach them a game that already gave the Russian so much.

Nadia Petrova

“It gave me such a great opportunity to travel the world, to experience different cultures and cuisines, to get to know a lot of wonderful people. Hopefully, when I was playing my best, I was able to inspire some kids with my game. I was able to give back to the community through all the charity work that I did on my own and together with the WTA.”

A natural athlete and experienced competitor, the two-time Olympian can’t help but sometimes wonder, “what if?” But whether or not she returns to tennis, Nadia Petrova ultimately appears at peace.

“I do think, maybe I was starting now, things would have been different for me; getting to a Grand Slam win or get to the top of the rankings, I believe, was a lot harder then. Every week there was Serena, Venus, and Davenport and Capriati, Justine, Kim, and Mauresmo. It was a tough competition.

“The generation when I played, the Top 10 was just packed with huge names. Many ended up winning Slams and carried on such great careers that the majority of them will be in the Tennis Hall of Fame.

“I am very honored and proud that I was also playing during this kind of time.”

All photos courtesy of Getty Images.

Source link